Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-02 10:24:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4B3CC3E33CB23433A43B20E6E9CB37A23ACA8F0365303B116B29CD8FC04636E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The linked post falsely claims that the Employment Appeal Tribunal concluded that “there is significant scientific evidence that [gender critical beliefs are] wrong”. This was part of the first instance judgment, which was overturned on appeal. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708777507527311582
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4B3CC3E33CB23433A43B20E6E9CB37A23ACA8F0365303B116B29CD8FC04636E
  • createdAtMillis - 1696242295993
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1708777507527311582D4B3CC3E33CB23433A43B20E6E9CB37A23ACA8F0365303B116B29CD8FC04636E