Birdwatch Note
2023-10-02 09:34:40 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The linked post falsely claims that the Employment Appeal Tribunal concluded that “there is significant scientific evidence that [gender critical beliefs are] wrong”. This was part of the first instance judgment, which was overturned on appeal. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf
Written by B4BB09BD3916262B6D236EC51E80A9264452978061D5E9EF6FEA74F5053A5346
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1708446730616738270
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1708777507527311582
- noteId - 1708777507527311582
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B4BB09BD3916262B6D236EC51E80A9264452978061D5E9EF6FEA74F5053A5346 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696239280005
- tweetId - 1708446730616738270
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The linked post falsely claims that the Employment Appeal Tribunal concluded that “there is significant scientific evidence that [gender critical beliefs are] wrong”. This was part of the first instance judgment, which was overturned on appeal. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-02 09:34:40 UTC (1696239280005) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-03 02:49:27 UTC (1696301367088) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-02 14:32:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 13:41:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 13:28:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 11:10:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 07:38:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 05:24:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 05:01:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 04:57:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 10:59:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 04:35:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 13:31:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-11 18:48:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 02:49:33 -0500 | Rating Details |