Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-19 14:56:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E624CC078FC40138F689241DC38E0AE573A66CF76598A04F6C4F449FC2CBD15E
Participant Details

Original Note:

For context, the source for this article is a pro-Russian Telegram channel, and very little evidence is provided to support the assertion. There is no evidence NYT had “investigators” on the ground. This is an excellent X thread that provides scientifically sound analysis: https://x.com/nafomono/status/1702687206907805896

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1704145947880521906
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E624CC078FC40138F689241DC38E0AE573A66CF76598A04F6C4F449FC2CBD15E
  • createdAtMillis - 1695135391452
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1704145947880521906E624CC078FC40138F689241DC38E0AE573A66CF76598A04F6C4F449FC2CBD15E