Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-19 14:50:30 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

For context, the source for this article is a pro-Russian Telegram channel, and very little evidence is provided to support the assertion. There is no evidence NYT had “investigators” on the ground. This is an excellent X thread that provides scientifically sound analysis: https://x.com/nafomono/status/1702687206907805896

Written by 8BD8D9F64A66C8A039AFD1F575215C83AFD3B05B6CE4AD9E2EBCDF9BD26B3D98
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1704045167676703034

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1704145947880521906
  • noteId - 1704145947880521906
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8BD8D9F64A66C8A039AFD1F575215C83AFD3B05B6CE4AD9E2EBCDF9BD26B3D98 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1695135030135
  • tweetId - 1704045167676703034
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • For context, the source for this article is a pro-Russian Telegram channel, and very little evidence is provided to support the assertion. There is no evidence NYT had “investigators” on the ground. This is an excellent X thread that provides scientifically sound analysis: https://x.com/nafomono/status/1702687206907805896

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-19 14:50:30 UTC
(1695135030135)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-21 03:39:50 UTC
(1695267590895)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-19 18:30:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 17:48:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 16:28:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 15:54:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 14:52:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 14:28:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 14:16:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 12:01:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 11:50:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 09:56:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 09:54:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 09:52:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-20 13:59:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-20 13:41:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-20 13:21:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-20 11:43:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-20 09:57:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-20 02:08:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-20 01:21:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 22:51:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-21 04:02:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-20 23:46:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-20 23:20:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-23 19:09:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-16 13:05:31 -0500 Rating Details