Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-11 05:39:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D4BA7748259CC063BD4F385D1BF4E23D06A64B11286A55B42C5972DAACB0B89
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is untrue to claim that the Voice will merely be "advisory committee." There is nothing in the proposed constitutional amendment which defines what the Voice. The rĂ´le and constitution of the Voice could be *anything* that this, or any future, Australian Parliament decides https://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/learn/the-question.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1700703010597548133
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D4BA7748259CC063BD4F385D1BF4E23D06A64B11286A55B42C5972DAACB0B89
  • createdAtMillis - 1694410797447
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17007030105975481337D4BA7748259CC063BD4F385D1BF4E23D06A64B11286A55B42C5972DAACB0B89