Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-10 02:49:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

It is untrue to claim that the Voice will merely be "advisory committee." There is nothing in the proposed constitutional amendment which defines what the Voice. The rôle and constitution of the Voice could be *anything* that this, or any future, Australian Parliament decides https://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/learn/the-question.html

Written by A3710392D78B427965049A4C99F63AF1C833AACC8474D1FDE282864DF03E4930
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1700675274822803855

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1700703010597548133
  • noteId - 1700703010597548133
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A3710392D78B427965049A4C99F63AF1C833AACC8474D1FDE282864DF03E4930 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1694314169917
  • tweetId - 1700675274822803855
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • It is untrue to claim that the Voice will merely be "advisory committee." There is nothing in the proposed constitutional amendment which defines what the Voice. The rôle and constitution of the Voice could be *anything* that this, or any future, Australian Parliament decides https://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/learn/the-question.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-10 02:49:29 UTC
(1694314169917)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-10 04:39:13 UTC
(1694320753742)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-10 17:58:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 09:43:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 08:06:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 06:51:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 04:30:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 04:19:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 03:50:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 01:50:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 01:15:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 00:49:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 22:37:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 22:16:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-11 00:39:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 19:58:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 19:46:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-12 23:45:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 03:57:16 -0500 Rating Details