Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-18 07:12:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6E0924844E59BFA46D056809DC1BFF5CBD5EE3B773EC8DE8A805B000070061D
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the buffer solution included with the test was not used, no test was actually performed. They simply ruined the test by putting water on it. Had the water been mixed into the reagent, it would have tested negative, as confirmed by this study: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(21)00654-8/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699277907359649826
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6E0924844E59BFA46D056809DC1BFF5CBD5EE3B773EC8DE8A805B000070061D
  • createdAtMillis - 1695021154010
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1699277907359649826A6E0924844E59BFA46D056809DC1BFF5CBD5EE3B773EC8DE8A805B000070061D