Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-06 04:26:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

As the buffer solution included with the test was not used, no test was actually performed. They simply ruined the test by putting water on it. Had the water been mixed into the reagent, it would have tested negative, as confirmed by this study: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(21)00654-8/fulltext

Written by 513E05EFC8451B3156F05CE6533E8DFAA3CC98D95E923A8A9BF5A8F6B2613C14
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1699163540576227423

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1699277907359649826
  • noteId - 1699277907359649826
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 513E05EFC8451B3156F05CE6533E8DFAA3CC98D95E923A8A9BF5A8F6B2613C14 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693974398831
  • tweetId - 1699163540576227423
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • As the buffer solution included with the test was not used, no test was actually performed. They simply ruined the test by putting water on it. Had the water been mixed into the reagent, it would have tested negative, as confirmed by this study: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(21)00654-8/fulltext

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-06 04:26:38 UTC
(1693974398831)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-07 02:40:10 UTC
(1694054410803)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-06 15:48:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-06 13:53:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-06 13:15:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-06 10:14:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-06 03:51:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-06 03:21:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-06 01:16:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-06 00:52:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 23:58:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 23:57:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 23:54:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-07 06:46:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 15:30:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 08:16:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 03:04:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 02:28:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-12 07:48:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 02:12:34 -0500 Rating Details