Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-04 21:08:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C6E2EB32EC5260FBD1421C65F9D06333AE0E34D1A9BDFDA531DAF25E25203FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Even if people do argue over this glass of water, it is a statistically insignificant single "thing". Proof would require a significantly greater subset of all things chosen at random. https://hbr.org/2016/02/a-refresher-on-statistical-significance

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698801532530024937
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C6E2EB32EC5260FBD1421C65F9D06333AE0E34D1A9BDFDA531DAF25E25203FD
  • createdAtMillis - 1693861693503
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16988015325300249371C6E2EB32EC5260FBD1421C65F9D06333AE0E34D1A9BDFDA531DAF25E25203FD