Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-04 20:53:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Even if people do argue over this glass of water, it is a statistically insignificant single "thing". Proof would require a significantly greater subset of all things chosen at random. https://hbr.org/2016/02/a-refresher-on-statistical-significance

Written by B1157C994571442DFB67BFA7C184E96BB0F7F739D4703507F053A21372A6FEA1
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1698740314272346135

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1698801532530024937
  • noteId - 1698801532530024937
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - B1157C994571442DFB67BFA7C184E96BB0F7F739D4703507F053A21372A6FEA1 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693860822215
  • tweetId - 1698740314272346135
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Even if people do argue over this glass of water, it is a statistically insignificant single "thing". Proof would require a significantly greater subset of all things chosen at random. https://hbr.org/2016/02/a-refresher-on-statistical-significance

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-04 20:53:42 UTC
(1693860822215)
2023-09-05 15:10:06 UTC
(1693926606533)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-09-07 02:40:10 UTC
(1694054410803)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-09-05 15:10:06 UTC
(1693926606533)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-04 17:53:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-04 16:08:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-04 16:07:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-04 15:58:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 06:51:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 00:42:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-04 19:48:01 -0500 Rating Details