Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-30 13:00:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6185114E79D203AED27C43984A0885FE052C36CBADACC0989851236CCD2D708B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note is misleading The Cochrane review it doesn't link to is misrepresented in purpose & quality, per EIC: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/masks-effective-study-respected-group-misinterpreted/story?id=97846561 Review itself claims low quality ("high risk of bias", "low adherence"), even says "N95 … compared with … surgical masks may be effective": https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full Studies support article: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7106e1.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696868550625878486
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6185114E79D203AED27C43984A0885FE052C36CBADACC0989851236CCD2D708B
  • createdAtMillis - 1693400443458
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16968685506258784866185114E79D203AED27C43984A0885FE052C36CBADACC0989851236CCD2D708B