Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-30 12:52:43 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Note is misleading The Cochrane review it doesn't link to is misrepresented in purpose & quality, per EIC: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/masks-effective-study-respected-group-misinterpreted/story?id=97846561 Review itself claims low quality ("high risk of bias", "low adherence"), even says "N95 … compared with … surgical masks may be effective": https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full Studies support article: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7106e1.htm

Written by 9CB8A0359B83A831EDE9A38FFE0E3E5ED73D1677A50374D2E1619F1450E2E77A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1695858443498783173

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1696868550625878486
  • noteId - 1696868550625878486
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9CB8A0359B83A831EDE9A38FFE0E3E5ED73D1677A50374D2E1619F1450E2E77A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693399963417
  • tweetId - 1695858443498783173
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Note is misleading The Cochrane review it doesn't link to is misrepresented in purpose & quality, per EIC: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/masks-effective-study-respected-group-misinterpreted/story?id=97846561 Review itself claims low quality ("high risk of bias", "low adherence"), even says "N95 … compared with … surgical masks may be effective": https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full Studies support article: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7106e1.htm

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-30 12:52:43 UTC
(1693399963417)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-31 02:11:33 UTC
(1693447893349)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-30 08:16:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-30 08:00:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-04 07:53:28 -0500 Rating Details