Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-29 06:47:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8BDCD3504A535CA028822F4E9D0F120F20F5294F29DA6CA5C37E245CEF5B1C49
Participant Details

Original Note:

No Note Needed: Previous note suggests it is treatment without prejudice. The Judges history and past posts indicates she has clear prejudice against the person charged. Assumption of interference is reasonable. https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/judge-tanya-chutkans-record-should-disqualify-her-from-presiding-over-trumps-j6-trial/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696244878542295209
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8BDCD3504A535CA028822F4E9D0F120F20F5294F29DA6CA5C37E245CEF5B1C49
  • createdAtMillis - 1693291677071
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16962448785422952098BDCD3504A535CA028822F4E9D0F120F20F5294F29DA6CA5C37E245CEF5B1C49