Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-28 19:34:28 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

No Note Needed: Previous note suggests it is treatment without prejudice. The Judges history and past posts indicates she has clear prejudice against the person charged. Assumption of interference is reasonable. https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/judge-tanya-chutkans-record-should-disqualify-her-from-presiding-over-trumps-j6-trial/

Written by C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1696210102485733769

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1696244878542295209
  • noteId - 1696244878542295209
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693251268405
  • tweetId - 1696210102485733769
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • No Note Needed: Previous note suggests it is treatment without prejudice. The Judges history and past posts indicates she has clear prejudice against the person charged. Assumption of interference is reasonable. https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/judge-tanya-chutkans-record-should-disqualify-her-from-presiding-over-trumps-j6-trial/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-28 19:34:28 UTC
(1693251268405)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-29 02:11:18 UTC
(1693275078609)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-28 18:50:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 18:06:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 17:23:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 17:22:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 16:27:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 16:06:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 15:56:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 15:52:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 15:28:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 15:23:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 15:08:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 15:06:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 15:01:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 14:40:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 14:40:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:27:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 11:53:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 11:37:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 11:13:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 09:07:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 08:55:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 08:40:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 06:24:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 06:01:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 05:12:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 04:19:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 02:46:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 01:47:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 00:42:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 21:04:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 20:30:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 20:15:38 -0500 Rating Details