Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-29 11:24:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 066D2E4443D9B81429E014524AEF7606CFF4121849B8D3EED92D65904AEB5450
Participant Details

Original Note:

No Note Needed: Previous note suggests it is treatment without prejudice. The Judges history and past posts indicates she has clear prejudice against the person charged. Assumption of interference is reasonable. https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/judge-tanya-chutkans-record-should-disqualify-her-from-presiding-over-trumps-j6-trial/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696244878542295209
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 066D2E4443D9B81429E014524AEF7606CFF4121849B8D3EED92D65904AEB5450
  • createdAtMillis - 1693308287210
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1696244878542295209066D2E4443D9B81429E014524AEF7606CFF4121849B8D3EED92D65904AEB5450