Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 18:22:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEDF14DB83FE181E9604AC80B709827E0C5D80F4D48909B3EE0B4822E9F65663
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the debate on whether hate speech should be banned has involved countless philosophers and political scientists, neither side has put forward a conclusive argument yet. Thus, it's wrong to state that hate speech is free speech, as it's implied by the question in the post. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051517-012343

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695487204724818400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEDF14DB83FE181E9604AC80B709827E0C5D80F4D48909B3EE0B4822E9F65663
  • createdAtMillis - 1693074163112
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695487204724818400CEDF14DB83FE181E9604AC80B709827E0C5D80F4D48909B3EE0B4822E9F65663