Birdwatch Note
2023-08-26 17:23:44 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
While the debate on whether hate speech should be banned has involved countless philosophers and political scientists, neither side has put forward a conclusive argument yet. Thus, it's wrong to state that hate speech is free speech, as it's implied by the question in the post. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051517-012343
Written by 974DAD4A6A4ECC9BD82BD03887CB0D1AC2CA4BF93A42FDC76D89C20C28DB268E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1695289208796336439
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1695487204724818400
- noteId - 1695487204724818400
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 974DAD4A6A4ECC9BD82BD03887CB0D1AC2CA4BF93A42FDC76D89C20C28DB268E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1693070624893
- tweetId - 1695289208796336439
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- While the debate on whether hate speech should be banned has involved countless philosophers and political scientists, neither side has put forward a conclusive argument yet. Thus, it's wrong to state that hate speech is free speech, as it's implied by the question in the post. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051517-012343
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-08-26 17:23:44 UTC (1693070624893) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-27 02:42:19 UTC (1693104139456) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-08-26 13:22:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-26 13:11:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-26 13:06:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-26 12:49:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-26 12:42:58 -0500 | Rating Details |