Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-24 20:53:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is factually incorrect. The Australian Electoral Commission has clarified, as legislation also does, that both 'yes' and 'no' are valid voting options while anything else risks not being counted. For example a tick *may* be viewed as a yes vote. https://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/aec/faqs.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694632525313061124
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1692910424408
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1694632525313061124A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF