Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-24 21:02:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 807AA07F92647972A0BBB16271A5E72C20D2283D6575432FE3123E9B95D3E52A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is factually incorrect. The Australian Electoral Commission has clarified, as legislation also does, that both 'yes' and 'no' are valid voting options while anything else risks not being counted. For example a tick *may* be viewed as a yes vote. https://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/aec/faqs.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694632525313061124
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 807AA07F92647972A0BBB16271A5E72C20D2283D6575432FE3123E9B95D3E52A
  • createdAtMillis - 1692910928346
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1694632525313061124807AA07F92647972A0BBB16271A5E72C20D2283D6575432FE3123E9B95D3E52A