Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-22 14:13:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5C24B8933830A52C971DB69B2DBE1D4603FCE0743CEFCF61289DB5A6E08BB788
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, l’article relaie l’avis de l’Agence Internationale de l’Energie Atomique (avec un lien en plus vers un article expliquant le rapport) . Il prend en compte les avis d’autres scientifiques (CNRS ou encore l’Association Nationale des Laboratoires Marins) qui ont des doutes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693670832625627491
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5C24B8933830A52C971DB69B2DBE1D4603FCE0743CEFCF61289DB5A6E08BB788
  • createdAtMillis - 1692713602263
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16936708326256274915C24B8933830A52C971DB69B2DBE1D4603FCE0743CEFCF61289DB5A6E08BB788