Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-21 17:06:08 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN, l’article relaie l’avis de l’Agence Internationale de l’Energie Atomique (avec un lien en plus vers un article expliquant le rapport) . Il prend en compte les avis d’autres scientifiques (CNRS ou encore l’Association Nationale des Laboratoires Marins) qui ont des doutes.

Written by 2D0EE99E8263D4E8AF4E7AC5EC4D0F70A8E68C13A2BF6EC1635DE5BFE0700CD1
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1693534400862998764

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1693670832625627491
  • noteId - 1693670832625627491
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2D0EE99E8263D4E8AF4E7AC5EC4D0F70A8E68C13A2BF6EC1635DE5BFE0700CD1 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692637568035
  • tweetId - 1693534400862998764
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN, l’article relaie l’avis de l’Agence Internationale de l’Energie Atomique (avec un lien en plus vers un article expliquant le rapport) . Il prend en compte les avis d’autres scientifiques (CNRS ou encore l’Association Nationale des Laboratoires Marins) qui ont des doutes.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-21 17:06:08 UTC
(1692637568035)
2023-08-22 01:12:38 UTC
(1692666758558)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-08-22 02:43:25 UTC
(1692672205874)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-08-22 01:12:38 UTC
(1692666758558)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-21 18:48:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-21 17:15:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-21 15:49:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-21 12:32:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-21 12:13:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 10:10:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 09:13:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 08:53:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 01:22:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 00:12:18 -0500 Rating Details