Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-21 20:41:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3EB75CEFB70B69FFE77B4020D6837A2826672451184AD4D8EBE0D871706DFD45
Participant Details

Original Note:

(1) 安田氏本人から反論が出ています。「原告に関連しそうな、発給しない条項」は想像であって、事実の提示とは言えません。 https://twitter.com/YASUDAjumpei/status/1693505424325300730 (2) 望月氏が問題にしているのは旅券の不発給が憲法違反かどうかであり、憲法より下位の法律を以て当然に否定できる主張ではありません。これは意見の範疇であり、事実を争う内容ではありません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693582746856419506
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3EB75CEFB70B69FFE77B4020D6837A2826672451184AD4D8EBE0D871706DFD45
  • createdAtMillis - 1692650502893
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16935827468564195063EB75CEFB70B69FFE77B4020D6837A2826672451184AD4D8EBE0D871706DFD45