Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-21 14:08:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35A95ACD750AFFC777C798F9086D9C099C69D7564CA73751F9816138939C6737
Participant Details

Original Note:

(1) 安田氏本人から反論が出ています。「原告に関連しそうな、発給しない条項」は想像であって、事実の提示とは言えません。 https://twitter.com/YASUDAjumpei/status/1693505424325300730 (2) 望月氏が問題にしているのは旅券の不発給が憲法違反かどうかであり、憲法より下位の法律を以て当然に否定できる主張ではありません。これは意見の範疇であり、事実を争う内容ではありません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693582746856419506
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35A95ACD750AFFC777C798F9086D9C099C69D7564CA73751F9816138939C6737
  • createdAtMillis - 1692626883506
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169358274685641950635A95ACD750AFFC777C798F9086D9C099C69D7564CA73751F9816138939C6737