Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-19 10:57:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 51A208310029F328098C5CFC8FF40D77CC42FEB8305EA5554D5060A92AF3075A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Laut Anklage war der Richter nicht zuständig und hat seine richterliche Unabhängigkeit missachtet. Das Verfahren betrifft nicht die rechtliche und sachliche Einordnung der Corona-Maßnahmen. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/regional/thueringen/mdr-weimarer-amtsrichter-wegen-maskenpflicht-beschlusses-vor-gericht-100.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692850307728871932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 51A208310029F328098C5CFC8FF40D77CC42FEB8305EA5554D5060A92AF3075A
  • createdAtMillis - 1692442660505
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 169285030772887193251A208310029F328098C5CFC8FF40D77CC42FEB8305EA5554D5060A92AF3075A