Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-19 10:45:39 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Laut Anklage war der Richter nicht zuständig und hat seine richterliche Unabhängigkeit missachtet. Das Verfahren betrifft nicht die rechtliche und sachliche Einordnung der Corona-Maßnahmen. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/regional/thueringen/mdr-weimarer-amtsrichter-wegen-maskenpflicht-beschlusses-vor-gericht-100.html

Written by 68A189FCE0EDB7BA201BE03C6DDDAC82AE7112F1AE98E06241916A1525EE7B87
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1692847040898732095

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1692850307728871932
  • noteId - 1692850307728871932
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 68A189FCE0EDB7BA201BE03C6DDDAC82AE7112F1AE98E06241916A1525EE7B87 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692441939657
  • tweetId - 1692847040898732095
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Laut Anklage war der Richter nicht zuständig und hat seine richterliche Unabhängigkeit missachtet. Das Verfahren betrifft nicht die rechtliche und sachliche Einordnung der Corona-Maßnahmen. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/regional/thueringen/mdr-weimarer-amtsrichter-wegen-maskenpflicht-beschlusses-vor-gericht-100.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-19 10:45:39 UTC
(1692441939657)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-20 02:11:21 UTC
(1692497481502)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-19 17:35:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 14:20:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 13:49:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 11:18:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 10:16:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 06:55:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 06:33:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-20 14:17:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-20 12:28:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-20 16:00:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-20 04:15:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-20 02:47:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-20 02:43:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 11:54:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-19 05:57:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 05:04:11 -0500 Rating Details