Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-19 15:16:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 153564311993101D1C21D1B77E111E997F391522641A78CC4D82D5B6070845F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Laut Anklage war der Richter nicht zuständig und hat seine richterliche Unabhängigkeit missachtet. Das Verfahren betrifft nicht die rechtliche und sachliche Einordnung der Corona-Maßnahmen. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/regional/thueringen/mdr-weimarer-amtsrichter-wegen-maskenpflicht-beschlusses-vor-gericht-100.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1692850307728871932
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 153564311993101D1C21D1B77E111E997F391522641A78CC4D82D5B6070845F3
createdAtMillis - 1692458170694
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1692850307728871932153564311993101D1C21D1B77E111E997F391522641A78CC4D82D5B6070845F3