Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-15 04:23:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D23C39E55C775B83B4D40670D737D092EB1E536F771655BAF657BEFF9E22735A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note links to https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344751288_Scrutinizing_Distributions_Proves_That_IQ_Is_Inherited_and_Explains_the_Fat_Tail, which is a good source. However the source and the Tweet agree in my reading of it where as the community note claims the tweet is a misinterpretation. From the linked article "Gaussian distribution of IQ of men (σ ≈ 16.2) and women (σ ≈ 13.2)"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690480683288805441
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D23C39E55C775B83B4D40670D737D092EB1E536F771655BAF657BEFF9E22735A
  • createdAtMillis - 1692073431323
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1690480683288805441D23C39E55C775B83B4D40670D737D092EB1E536F771655BAF657BEFF9E22735A