Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-12 21:49:37 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The note links to https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344751288_Scrutinizing_Distributions_Proves_That_IQ_Is_Inherited_and_Explains_the_Fat_Tail, which is a good source. However the source and the Tweet agree in my reading of it where as the community note claims the tweet is a misinterpretation. From the linked article "Gaussian distribution of IQ of men (σ ≈ 16.2) and women (σ ≈ 13.2)"

Written by 04EBE11D901BF19360FD7AC39DB9315D4094161FDE44B5C941B703283ADAF248
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1690151986228768768

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1690480683288805441
  • noteId - 1690480683288805441
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 04EBE11D901BF19360FD7AC39DB9315D4094161FDE44B5C941B703283ADAF248 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1691876977166
  • tweetId - 1690151986228768768
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The note links to https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344751288_Scrutinizing_Distributions_Proves_That_IQ_Is_Inherited_and_Explains_the_Fat_Tail, which is a good source. However the source and the Tweet agree in my reading of it where as the community note claims the tweet is a misinterpretation. From the linked article "Gaussian distribution of IQ of men (σ ≈ 16.2) and women (σ ≈ 13.2)"

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-12 21:49:37 UTC
(1691876977166)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-14 02:09:58 UTC
(1691978998272)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-13 16:32:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 11:15:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 11:12:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 07:58:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 07:17:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 05:09:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 04:46:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-13 00:10:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-12 22:01:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-12 21:24:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-12 19:02:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-12 17:22:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 11:31:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 02:13:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 23:23:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-14 23:02:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 13:43:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-16 01:08:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-18 02:54:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-08 21:02:41 -0500 Rating Details