Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-05 22:25:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADCD3DCCC75C42DD4E5C99EDD26249F3D2242CB5F016334D2BF5B12C1228DEFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

臨床試験の結果によれば、そもそもイベルメクチンやヒドロキシクロロキンが有効薬であるとはいえません。 イベルメクチン: 北里大学による二重盲検ランダム化比較試験(2023年5月発表) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37283627/ 興和による患者1,030例を対象とする二重盲検ランダム化の第III相臨床試験(2022年9月発表) https://www.kowa.co.jp/news/2022/press220926.pdf コクランレビュー https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD015017.pub3/full ヒドロキシクロロキン: WHO https://www.who.int/images/default-source/health-topics/coronavirus/myth-busters/web-mythbusters/who_hydroxychloraquine_hd.jpg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687819702360535112
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADCD3DCCC75C42DD4E5C99EDD26249F3D2242CB5F016334D2BF5B12C1228DEFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1691274305380
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1687819702360535112ADCD3DCCC75C42DD4E5C99EDD26249F3D2242CB5F016334D2BF5B12C1228DEFA