Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-05 15:00:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ACC760B0F6F3CDCCD7A097B2C54D053A80451F0907EE6BA77A0174D0A9F1CE9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

臨床試験の結果によれば、そもそもイベルメクチンやヒドロキシクロロキンが有効薬であるとはいえません。 イベルメクチン: 北里大学による二重盲検ランダム化比較試験(2023年5月発表) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37283627/ 興和による患者1,030例を対象とする二重盲検ランダム化の第III相臨床試験(2022年9月発表) https://www.kowa.co.jp/news/2022/press220926.pdf コクランレビュー https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD015017.pub3/full ヒドロキシクロロキン: WHO https://www.who.int/images/default-source/health-topics/coronavirus/myth-busters/web-mythbusters/who_hydroxychloraquine_hd.jpg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687819702360535112
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ACC760B0F6F3CDCCD7A097B2C54D053A80451F0907EE6BA77A0174D0A9F1CE9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1691247622420
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1687819702360535112ACC760B0F6F3CDCCD7A097B2C54D053A80451F0907EE6BA77A0174D0A9F1CE9E