Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 20:47:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36DA40B03DC6177F150C92C57B097220BE410A4E1681513A08AA61CE06B5665E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is false. The claim is from a 2013 article from the Daily Mail tabloid . It was refuted years ago: https://climatefeedback.org/claimreview/daily-mail-inflates-disagreement-scientists-data-handling-make-unsupported-accusation-data-manipulation/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681413371206434817
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36DA40B03DC6177F150C92C57B097220BE410A4E1681513A08AA61CE06B5665E
  • createdAtMillis - 1689799632060
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168141337120643481736DA40B03DC6177F150C92C57B097220BE410A4E1681513A08AA61CE06B5665E