Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-18 21:19:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This claim is false. The claim is from a 2013 article from the Daily Mail tabloid . It was refuted years ago: https://climatefeedback.org/claimreview/daily-mail-inflates-disagreement-scientists-data-handling-make-unsupported-accusation-data-manipulation/

Written by 5B2D76278EDE39B0D0100ED30D2A9B1527E21A5147071BE1D760577165585529
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1680338143566757888

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1681413371206434817
  • noteId - 1681413371206434817
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5B2D76278EDE39B0D0100ED30D2A9B1527E21A5147071BE1D760577165585529 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689715161503
  • tweetId - 1680338143566757888
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This claim is false. The claim is from a 2013 article from the Daily Mail tabloid . It was refuted years ago: https://climatefeedback.org/claimreview/daily-mail-inflates-disagreement-scientists-data-handling-make-unsupported-accusation-data-manipulation/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-18 21:19:21 UTC
(1689715161503)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-19 02:13:01 UTC
(1689732781414)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-18 19:14:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-18 16:47:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-18 16:43:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-18 16:33:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-18 16:25:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-19 16:12:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-19 15:47:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-19 13:17:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-18 22:38:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-21 00:48:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 23:44:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-26 09:13:35 -0500 Rating Details