Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-12 16:05:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE0BA32E952DCEF6CB257AF4585B618DA63219950120AE9E2FEAA0182D444F86
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study was a “pre-print” early stage review paper that had not been peer-reviewed and was not a Lancet publication. The Lancet states that the pre-print was removed because it deemed that the study's conclusions were not supported by the study methodology. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678848022703120389
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE0BA32E952DCEF6CB257AF4585B618DA63219950120AE9E2FEAA0182D444F86
  • createdAtMillis - 1689177937122
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1678848022703120389CE0BA32E952DCEF6CB257AF4585B618DA63219950120AE9E2FEAA0182D444F86