Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-11 19:25:34 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The study was a “pre-print” early stage review paper that had not been peer-reviewed and was not a Lancet publication. The Lancet states that the pre-print was removed because it deemed that the study's conclusions were not supported by the study methodology. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

Written by ACA3EF01EBE8B50472CCD518D198329C84BE8FF6F24A8F0DC55A1405E79DA541
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1678799964560936961

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1678848022703120389
  • noteId - 1678848022703120389
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - ACA3EF01EBE8B50472CCD518D198329C84BE8FF6F24A8F0DC55A1405E79DA541 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1689103534757
  • tweetId - 1678799964560936961
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The study was a “pre-print” early stage review paper that had not been peer-reviewed and was not a Lancet publication. The Lancet states that the pre-print was removed because it deemed that the study's conclusions were not supported by the study methodology. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-11 19:25:34 UTC
(1689103534757)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-12 18:23:52 UTC
(1689186232181)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-12 11:05:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 10:50:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 09:08:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 07:05:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 06:21:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 02:34:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 21:26:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 21:16:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 20:10:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 18:08:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 17:38:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 17:05:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 16:40:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 16:17:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 16:16:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 15:43:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 15:36:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 15:34:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 14:59:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 14:48:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 14:48:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 14:37:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 14:35:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 14:33:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 13:04:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-12 11:35:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 16:50:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-14 10:11:27 -0500 Rating Details