Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 22:05:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CD6DC917599504FCBA3E3E26F5156A76DB3A2345AF4D1B6472633AC2A78C346
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study was a “pre-print” early stage review paper that had not been peer-reviewed and was not a Lancet publication. The Lancet states that the pre-print was removed because it deemed that the study's conclusions were not supported by the study methodology. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678848022703120389
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CD6DC917599504FCBA3E3E26F5156A76DB3A2345AF4D1B6472633AC2A78C346
  • createdAtMillis - 1689113153052
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16788480227031203894CD6DC917599504FCBA3E3E26F5156A76DB3A2345AF4D1B6472633AC2A78C346