Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 10:41:57 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D794354A3DF83A30F87161F9E4D7360FA4BDAFFFEDB1F8E8085717F039050952
Participant Details

Original Note:

I don't know if this is true or not, but the other proposed Note is not helpful. If you want to provide a source as evidence that a Tweet is misleading, don't just link to a different Tweet. That is almost never a trustworthy source. Link to a primary source. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_source

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678471770716684288
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D794354A3DF83A30F87161F9E4D7360FA4BDAFFFEDB1F8E8085717F039050952
  • createdAtMillis - 1689072117886
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1678471770716684288D794354A3DF83A30F87161F9E4D7360FA4BDAFFFEDB1F8E8085717F039050952