Birdwatch Note
2023-07-10 18:30:29 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
I don't know if this is true or not, but the other proposed Note is not helpful. If you want to provide a source as evidence that a Tweet is misleading, don't just link to a different Tweet. That is almost never a trustworthy source. Link to a primary source. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_source
Written by 17E746A1FC5185292CC1AAB4350F7A3EFFE915E2A3144A395A8EEE968E57FCBA
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1678133306343276544
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1678471770716684288
- noteId - 1678471770716684288
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 17E746A1FC5185292CC1AAB4350F7A3EFFE915E2A3144A395A8EEE968E57FCBA Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1689013829295
- tweetId - 1678133306343276544
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- I don't know if this is true or not, but the other proposed Note is not helpful. If you want to provide a source as evidence that a Tweet is misleading, don't just link to a different Tweet. That is almost never a trustworthy source. Link to a primary source. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_source
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-07-10 18:30:29 UTC (1689013829295) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-11 02:09:54 UTC (1689041394513) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-07-10 19:29:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-10 19:21:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-10 18:38:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-10 16:08:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-10 14:19:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-10 14:02:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-11 10:08:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-11 05:41:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-10 23:58:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-10 20:35:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-10 20:11:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-10 19:34:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-10 19:34:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-16 15:13:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-18 14:16:36 -0500 | Rating Details |