Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 13:44:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4CC30A718414CD5EBE23BF2A8DACC8CC2FA0F8207EEA8D16ABDA7DDB7DA87AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

This Tweet references an AI/LLM legal tool, ChatLaw. Remember, such tools should support, not replace, professional legal advice. Misguided AI advice could lead to self-incrimination. Always consult a certified lawyer for accurate legal guidance https://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/newlaw/36756-why-shouldn-t-lawyers-necessarily-trust-chatgpt-or-similar-technologies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1677208723763392512
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D4CC30A718414CD5EBE23BF2A8DACC8CC2FA0F8207EEA8D16ABDA7DDB7DA87AC
createdAtMillis - 1688737451505
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1677208723763392512D4CC30A718414CD5EBE23BF2A8DACC8CC2FA0F8207EEA8D16ABDA7DDB7DA87AC