Birdwatch Note
2023-07-07 06:51:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This Tweet references an AI/LLM legal tool, ChatLaw. Remember, such tools should support, not replace, professional legal advice. Misguided AI advice could lead to self-incrimination. Always consult a certified lawyer for accurate legal guidance https://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/newlaw/36756-why-shouldn-t-lawyers-necessarily-trust-chatgpt-or-similar-technologies
Written by 8BC25D2A2494492DC4F30CD6D3FBE61440C34CD056ACDE7456B6D46D6C1CDFBE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1676952151824961537
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1677208723763392512
- noteId - 1677208723763392512
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8BC25D2A2494492DC4F30CD6D3FBE61440C34CD056ACDE7456B6D46D6C1CDFBE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688712695434
- tweetId - 1676952151824961537
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This Tweet references an AI/LLM legal tool, ChatLaw. Remember, such tools should support, not replace, professional legal advice. Misguided AI advice could lead to self-incrimination. Always consult a certified lawyer for accurate legal guidance https://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/newlaw/36756-why-shouldn-t-lawyers-necessarily-trust-chatgpt-or-similar-technologies
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-07-07 06:51:35 UTC (1688712695434) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-07 18:12:46 UTC (1688753566047) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-07-07 09:26:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 09:17:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 08:48:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 08:44:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 08:37:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 08:20:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 07:57:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 07:55:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 07:31:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 07:08:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 06:53:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 06:10:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 02:18:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-07 01:55:58 -0500 | Rating Details |