Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 11:53:59 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D42EC879B1F3267B5545E987437EEFA4240F1AA408428450F85C530AA01DA96
Participant Details

Original Note:

This Tweet references an AI/LLM legal tool, ChatLaw. Remember, such tools should support, not replace, professional legal advice. Misguided AI advice could lead to self-incrimination. Always consult a certified lawyer for accurate legal guidance https://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/newlaw/36756-why-shouldn-t-lawyers-necessarily-trust-chatgpt-or-similar-technologies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1677208723763392512
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1D42EC879B1F3267B5545E987437EEFA4240F1AA408428450F85C530AA01DA96
createdAtMillis - 1688730839594
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16772087237633925121D42EC879B1F3267B5545E987437EEFA4240F1AA408428450F85C530AA01DA96