Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-05 23:59:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E2D77920A75B9184A17DA25F8FC44EA811804B03016B4DC82E9099774AC854BF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Some peer reviewed context: "Rowbotham and Clayton make a very important point [re:] life expectancy at birth compared to life expectancy at 5+ years of age ... life expectancy in the mid-Victorian period was not markedly different from what it is today." https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1258/jrsm.2008.08k037

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676292057365618697
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E2D77920A75B9184A17DA25F8FC44EA811804B03016B4DC82E9099774AC854BF
  • createdAtMillis - 1688601592015
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1676292057365618697E2D77920A75B9184A17DA25F8FC44EA811804B03016B4DC82E9099774AC854BF