Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-04 18:09:05 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Some peer reviewed context: "Rowbotham and Clayton make a very important point [re:] life expectancy at birth compared to life expectancy at 5+ years of age ... life expectancy in the mid-Victorian period was not markedly different from what it is today." https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1258/jrsm.2008.08k037

Written by D00E805A13F47A34E1405B1BFD6B8E4D70DCDEDDEC005C1467F12CC697F5CF3D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1676197048536768522

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1676292057365618697
  • noteId - 1676292057365618697
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - D00E805A13F47A34E1405B1BFD6B8E4D70DCDEDDEC005C1467F12CC697F5CF3D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688494145135
  • tweetId - 1676197048536768522
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Some peer reviewed context: "Rowbotham and Clayton make a very important point [re:] life expectancy at birth compared to life expectancy at 5+ years of age ... life expectancy in the mid-Victorian period was not markedly different from what it is today." https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1258/jrsm.2008.08k037

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-04 18:09:05 UTC
(1688494145135)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-07-05 02:12:43 UTC
(1688523163429)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-04 19:31:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 19:28:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 19:28:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 18:48:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 18:09:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 17:20:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 16:48:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 16:45:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 16:43:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 16:35:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 16:11:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 15:47:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 15:05:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 14:15:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 14:08:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:48:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:43:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:43:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:41:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:20:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:13:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 13:10:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 03:26:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 02:33:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 00:32:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 00:25:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 22:01:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 21:32:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 20:09:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 09:07:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 09:03:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 19:08:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 18:59:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 18:16:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 14:10:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 07:43:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 05:21:43 -0500 Rating Details