Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-04 02:12:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 957F774D2E74307E3AA92B140A74AE7BF4388F0378AE37C0E1DD03923B92DDDB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is written from the perspective of opinion, but this is a sitting Senator that in & of itself gives legitimacy & authenticity to his claim. SCOTUS adjudicates cases based on their legal interpretation of the Constitution & how it applies to laws relevant to the case.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676050258860687360
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 957F774D2E74307E3AA92B140A74AE7BF4388F0378AE37C0E1DD03923B92DDDB
  • createdAtMillis - 1688436775599
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1676050258860687360957F774D2E74307E3AA92B140A74AE7BF4388F0378AE37C0E1DD03923B92DDDB