Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-04 02:08:15 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The tweet is written from the perspective of opinion, but this is a sitting Senator that in & of itself gives legitimacy & authenticity to his claim. SCOTUS adjudicates cases based on their legal interpretation of the Constitution & how it applies to laws relevant to the case.

Written by DDDE63759FB8853DF7378E3B3CFFD128C96F6D76E6B909D173D2C69BED57E4FB
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674850289717858304

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1676050258860687360
  • noteId - 1676050258860687360
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - DDDE63759FB8853DF7378E3B3CFFD128C96F6D76E6B909D173D2C69BED57E4FB Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688436495876
  • tweetId - 1674850289717858304
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • The tweet is written from the perspective of opinion, but this is a sitting Senator that in & of itself gives legitimacy & authenticity to his claim. SCOTUS adjudicates cases based on their legal interpretation of the Constitution & how it applies to laws relevant to the case.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-04 02:08:15 UTC
(1688436495876)
2023-07-04 08:08:59 UTC
(1688458139927)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-07-05 02:12:43 UTC
(1688523163429)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-07-04 08:08:59 UTC
(1688458139927)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-04 06:27:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 01:17:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 00:32:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 00:23:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 00:03:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 23:39:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 22:13:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 22:07:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 21:20:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 21:12:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 21:12:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-06 14:14:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-11 04:50:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-16 20:04:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-20 23:35:20 -0500 Rating Details