Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-04 05:23:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1DF87FBC3D4050F4B5B0836C40FFE7F009140AF98A0ECB8EDF0067DD46D902AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is written from the perspective of opinion, but this is a sitting Senator that in & of itself gives legitimacy & authenticity to his claim. SCOTUS adjudicates cases based on their legal interpretation of the Constitution & how it applies to laws relevant to the case.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676050258860687360
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1DF87FBC3D4050F4B5B0836C40FFE7F009140AF98A0ECB8EDF0067DD46D902AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1688448182342
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16760502588606873601DF87FBC3D4050F4B5B0836C40FFE7F009140AF98A0ECB8EDF0067DD46D902AB