Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-04 04:52:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58EC64D6BA8B00C455CDD4A7A67349660181837D6CE71ED94024E28FEDA159A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Tweet includes a direct quote from the paper and a link to the paper If you want to argue about the effectiveness of the bivalent booster, do so as a reply to the tweet

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676002445216960512
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58EC64D6BA8B00C455CDD4A7A67349660181837D6CE71ED94024E28FEDA159A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1688446353147
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167600244521696051258EC64D6BA8B00C455CDD4A7A67349660181837D6CE71ED94024E28FEDA159A0