Birdwatch Note
2023-07-03 22:58:16 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Tweet includes a direct quote from the paper and a link to the paper If you want to argue about the effectiveness of the bivalent booster, do so as a reply to the tweet
Written by 5E42613A847A9BD5602E1C7BA536C7F9B29DF9C8BEBB74AA47196F40CCB99450
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1675875543806246914
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1676002445216960512
- noteId - 1676002445216960512
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5E42613A847A9BD5602E1C7BA536C7F9B29DF9C8BEBB74AA47196F40CCB99450 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688425096217
- tweetId - 1675875543806246914
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN Tweet includes a direct quote from the paper and a link to the paper If you want to argue about the effectiveness of the bivalent booster, do so as a reply to the tweet
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-07-03 22:58:16 UTC (1688425096217) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-04 02:10:44 UTC (1688436644963) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-07-03 19:12:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 19:06:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 18:27:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 18:16:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 18:04:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 18:03:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-04 12:19:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-04 09:59:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-04 06:32:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-04 03:03:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-04 02:48:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-04 02:48:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-04 02:08:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-04 02:05:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-04 01:17:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-04 00:34:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 23:58:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 23:52:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 23:47:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 23:45:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 01:42:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 00:59:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-04 19:44:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-06 04:37:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 18:23:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 18:36:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-08 11:46:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-09 15:33:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-12 09:37:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-24 13:09:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-06 01:07:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-24 03:14:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-01 11:21:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-01 10:14:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-23 08:41:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-24 13:48:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-20 11:21:41 -0600 | Rating Details |