Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-03 23:00:46 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EA2B5473C069BA1ED7DD0BB1FDEFC5DAF5500253AA38EE9F9A560481380AE1F9
Participant Details
Original Note:
The decision suggests a business can refuse to offer what the court called expressive services if doing so would run contrary to their beliefs. But that’s different from other businesses not engaged in speech and therefore not covered by the First Amendment. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-gay-rights-website-designer-aa529361bc939c837ec2ece216b296d5
All Note Details