Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-03 22:23:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The decision suggests a business can refuse to offer what the court called expressive services if doing so would run contrary to their beliefs. But that’s different from other businesses not engaged in speech and therefore not covered by the First Amendment. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-gay-rights-website-designer-aa529361bc939c837ec2ece216b296d5

Written by EDFD11E39E6F165046A98763B960967DD6C806A2A0B4E6E3E41D32AE93A16F1B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1675642340973637633

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1675993690920169473
  • noteId - 1675993690920169473
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - EDFD11E39E6F165046A98763B960967DD6C806A2A0B4E6E3E41D32AE93A16F1B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688423009030
  • tweetId - 1675642340973637633
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The decision suggests a business can refuse to offer what the court called expressive services if doing so would run contrary to their beliefs. But that’s different from other businesses not engaged in speech and therefore not covered by the First Amendment. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-gay-rights-website-designer-aa529361bc939c837ec2ece216b296d5

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-03 22:23:29 UTC
(1688423009030)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-04 02:10:44 UTC
(1688436644963)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-03 18:07:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 18:00:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 05:03:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-04 02:18:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 23:34:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 23:27:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 23:16:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 19:50:22 -0500 Rating Details