Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-03 16:36:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD280A8CC0C27A537CAB35E05F6C3FA852D2E7A9C6AC693B162D8D3E45897C09
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that "Stewart" was "One of the central figures at the heart of the LGBTQ+ rights case" is a lie. The record shows that the hoax inquiry played no part in the Court's decision. It is not mentioned in any of the rationale for the decision documented in the ruling. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/600/21-476/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675722067680067584
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD280A8CC0C27A537CAB35E05F6C3FA852D2E7A9C6AC693B162D8D3E45897C09
  • createdAtMillis - 1688402177421
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1675722067680067584DD280A8CC0C27A537CAB35E05F6C3FA852D2E7A9C6AC693B162D8D3E45897C09